Aerodynamics/Aerospace, Beginner: CFD Simulation Training Course

Aerodynamics/Aerospace, Beginner: CFD Simulation Training Course

10
2h 52m 25s
  1. Section 1

    Geometry and Mesh Training

    1. Episode 1 11m 35s Free
  2. Section 2

    SUPERSONIC Flow

  3. Section 3

    Rotating Disk - Moving Wall

  4. Section 4

    Wing SLOT Effect

  5. Section 5

    INTAKE of Jet Engine

  6. Section 6

    DRONE / UAV

  7. Section 7

    Airfoil COOLING

  8. Section 8

    3-D Airfoil

  9. Section 9

    Von Kármán

MR CFD
Oops! You are not logged in.

For watching this episode you should sign in first, if you don't have an account, you can create one in seconds.

Toggle Episode List

Aerodynamics/Aerospace, Beginner: CFD Simulation Training Course — Ep 02

Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk Analysis CFD Simulation, ANSYS Fluent

Episode
02
Run Time
Optimizing
Published
Nov 27, 2025
Course Progress
0%
Mark as Complete
Add to Watchlist
About This Episode

CFD Analysis: RQ-4 Global Hawk UAV

Overview

This study analyzes airflow around the Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk, a high-altitude UAV, using ANSYS Fluent CFD software. It examines aerodynamics at Mach 0.39 (cruise speed ~357 mph) and 5° angle of attack to understand lift, drag, and flow patterns.​

Geometry and Mesh

  • Model: Created in SpaceClaim, imported to Fluent Meshing.

  • Mesh Quality: 3.76 million elements; 10 boundary layer rows for near-wall accuracy; min orthogonality 0.18.

  • Domain: Symmetric setup with far-field boundaries.

Simulation Setup

  • Solver: Pressure-based, ideal gas air, steady-state.

  • Boundaries:

    Boundary Condition
    UAV Surface No-slip wall
    Inlet/Far-field Pressure far-field (M=0.39, α=5°)
     
     
  • Methods: SIMPLE coupling, standard initialization.

  • Extras: Includes FSI analysis and RBF-morph wing optimization for lift-to-drag ratio.

Key Results

  • Velocity: Boundary layers form; wake develops behind UAV with vortices (Fig 3).​

  • Pressure: Higher on lower wing (compressed air); lower on upper wing (faster flow → lift via Bernoulli) (Fig 4).​

  • -14m Plane Analysis:

    • Pressure coefficient: Peak at leading edge stagnation (Fig 5).

    • Pressure contour: High near leading edge (Fig 6).

    • Velocity contour: Zero at stagnation, accelerates along surface (Fig 7).

  • Forces: Lift = 199,110 N; Drag = 47,516 N (L/D ≈ 4.2 at these conditions).

Conclusion

The analysis confirms expected aerodynamics: pressure difference generates lift; wake causes drag. High-quality mesh ensures reliable results for design optimization. Matches Global Hawk specs (wingspan 131 ft, cruise 357 mph, ceiling 60,000 ft).