Aerodynamics/Aerospace, Beginner: CFD Simulation Training Course — Ep 02
Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk Analysis CFD Simulation, ANSYS Fluent
- Episode
- 02
- Run Time
- Optimizing
- Published
- Nov 27, 2025
- Topic
- Aerodynamics
- Course Progress
- 0%
CFD Analysis: RQ-4 Global Hawk UAV
Overview
This study analyzes airflow around the Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk, a high-altitude UAV, using ANSYS Fluent CFD software. It examines aerodynamics at Mach 0.39 (cruise speed ~357 mph) and 5° angle of attack to understand lift, drag, and flow patterns.
Geometry and Mesh
-
Model: Created in SpaceClaim, imported to Fluent Meshing.
-
Mesh Quality: 3.76 million elements; 10 boundary layer rows for near-wall accuracy; min orthogonality 0.18.
-
Domain: Symmetric setup with far-field boundaries.
Simulation Setup
-
Solver: Pressure-based, ideal gas air, steady-state.
-
Boundaries:
Boundary Condition UAV Surface No-slip wall Inlet/Far-field Pressure far-field (M=0.39, α=5°) -
Methods: SIMPLE coupling, standard initialization.
-
Extras: Includes FSI analysis and RBF-morph wing optimization for lift-to-drag ratio.
Key Results
-
Velocity: Boundary layers form; wake develops behind UAV with vortices (Fig 3).
-
Pressure: Higher on lower wing (compressed air); lower on upper wing (faster flow → lift via Bernoulli) (Fig 4).
-
-14m Plane Analysis:
-
Pressure coefficient: Peak at leading edge stagnation (Fig 5).
-
Pressure contour: High near leading edge (Fig 6).
-
Velocity contour: Zero at stagnation, accelerates along surface (Fig 7).
-
-
Forces: Lift = 199,110 N; Drag = 47,516 N (L/D ≈ 4.2 at these conditions).
Conclusion
The analysis confirms expected aerodynamics: pressure difference generates lift; wake causes drag. High-quality mesh ensures reliable results for design optimization. Matches Global Hawk specs (wingspan 131 ft, cruise 357 mph, ceiling 60,000 ft).