MR CFD
Oops! You are not logged in.

For watching this lesson you should sign in first, if you don't have an account, you can create one in seconds.

Toggle Lesson List
Lesson
04
Run Time
9m 17s
Published
Sep 3, 2026
Course Progress
0%
Mark as Complete
Add to Watchlist
About This Lesson

F-22 Aircraft CFD Simulation, ANSYS Fluent

Description

This project simulates an F-22 aircraft using ANSYS Fluent. The geometry was designed in SpaceClaim and meshed using Fluent Meshing, generating approximately 5 million polyhedral elements. Given the high Mach number of 0.4, the simulation was carried out using the density-based solver, with the flow assumed to be steady.

A related wing lift-to-drag ratio optimization of this aircraft using RBF Morph is also available and can be viewed here.

Methodology

The aircraft surface was defined as a wall, with all remaining boundaries set as pressure far-field conditions at a Mach number of 2. The SIMPLE algorithm was used with an explicit formulation, standard initialization, and the k-ε Realizable turbulence model. The working fluid was treated as an ideal gas (air).

Conclusion

The simulation produced a drag force of 74.067622 kN. Since the model was solved using symmetry, doubling this value yields approximately 148,135.244 N (≈148 kN) — close to the F-22's known engine thrust of roughly 156 kN, confirming a relatively accurate simulation with a percentage error of:

Percentage Error = (|156,000 − 148,135.244| / 156,000) × 100% ≈ 5.04%

The velocity contour shows the distribution of velocity magnitude around the aircraft, with higher velocities concentrated near the wings and tail. The pressure contour reveals higher-pressure regions at the wing leading edges and nose, with lower-pressure regions along the upper wing and tail surfaces. A pressure coefficient plot, taken on a plane 5 meters from the aircraft's center, illustrates the relative pressure distribution across that plane — positive values indicating high-pressure regions and negative values indicating low-pressure regions relative to freestream conditions.

Overall, the close agreement between the simulated drag force and the F-22's actual engine thrust — within roughly 5% error — confirms the simulation's accuracy, and the resulting velocity, pressure, and pressure coefficient contours provide a clear picture of flow behavior around the aircraft, suitable for further design analysis and optimization work.